lunesque: The face of a pale girl with dark hair. Faded text. (Default)
lunesque ([personal profile] lunesque) wrote2009-01-16 09:29 am
Entry tags:

(no subject)

*shouts at internet*

WHAT DO YOU MEAN, PESTILENCE ISN'T ACTUALLY A BIBLICAL HORSEMAN??

Was I really just pulling from pop culture? Who is this Conquest person??? Gah! *throws NaNo against the wall*

Quick question: should I ignore the fact that apparently I know nothing about the biblical apocalypse and continue with the original plan for chapter 6, despite the fact that I'm desperate for this to be as correct as possible, even though it's Supernatural, and really, legitimacy is laughable, or should I make myself both happier and the story more difficult to write by finding out about Conquest?

Sometimes I hate the way I write. -.-
ext_9141: (Default)

[identity profile] suaine.livejournal.com 2009-01-16 03:57 pm (UTC)(link)
It's not wrong, exactly. If I understand this (http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Revelation%206:1%E2%80%938;&version=31;) correctly, one of the Horsemen killed by spreading plague. Which is enough of a reason to call him Pestilence.

Image

The guy at the back, with the crown, that's your Conquest guy.

[identity profile] lunesque.livejournal.com 2009-01-16 05:06 pm (UTC)(link)
I get where you're coming from--but in this, Death and Pestilence are combined. And that's why I'm like, WTF? dude. I hate pop culture mistakes. On the other hand, Conquest might work better than Pestilence...